WesleyanHeritage Library Search
Menu
Asbury’s letters and related documents · Record 336

Undated — Address to Conference of 1816

Identified by the source address and context: Francis Asbury.

ASB_VOL3.PDF, PDF page 656

Notes (25)
  1. The parts of the address put here in italics were not in the original draft now owned by Wofford College. In the two copies there are many differences in capitalization of words and some changes of prepositions. ↩
  2. John Wesley. ↩
  3. Francis Asbury. ↩
  4. “Mother” instead of “mass” in Wofford College copy. ↩
  5. “Who” instead of “that” in Wofford College copy. ↩
  6. James O’Kelly. ↩
  7. “About two years” in Wofford College copy. ↩
  8. William McKendree. ↩
  9. William Hammett’s schism. ↩
  10. Thomas Rankin. ↩
  11. The reference is to the general meeting held in Caroline County, Virginia, in October, 1811. Caroline was William Guirey’s home county. Most of the O’Kellyite churches in Virginia were represented. Elias Smith (see note to letter of September 15, 1800), editor of Herald of Gospel Liberty, was present. The unnamed church in which they met had formerly been Methodist. The question asked was “Can Christian Brethren of the South unite with Christian Brethren of the North?” (the New England group led by Elias Smith). They agreed upon a union; and in 1815 the Virginia Christians were represented in the United States General Convention at Wyndham, Connecticut. The union was broken off in 1844. Sometime after the Caroline meeting William Guirey became editor of The Christian Sun in Suffolk, Virginia. It is not clear whether Philetus refers to Guirey or Elias Smith. (See MacClenny, The Life of Reverend James O’Kelly, 160- 65.) ↩
  12. Reference to O’Kellyites. ↩
  13. In the New York Advocate this paragraph is included. It is not in the Wofford College copy. ↩
  14. “Nashville” was not in the Wofford College copy. ↩
  15. The amendment was adopted. ↩
  16. The Wofford College copy begins “Of the.” ↩
  17. The Wofford College copy has “suffered.” ↩
  18. The formation of the Genesee Conference subjected Asbury and McKendree to much criticism. Several of the annual conferences took action in the matter, and finally the General Conference of 1812 was asked to pass upon it. This it did effectually by the unanimous adoption of the following resolution: “Moved that this General Conference do consider that the Genesee Annual Conference is a legally constituted and organized Conference.” (Note from the New York Advocate.) ↩
  19. Doubtless a reference to conference boundary lines, for at this conference the boundaries of the conferences were defined. ↩
  20. “Burden” instead of “load” in Wofford College copy. ↩
  21. “Great” instead of “greatly” in Wofford College copy. ↩
  22. “Almost” was placed before “constantly” in the Wofford College copy. ↩
  23. The Wofford College copy had “that” instead of “who.” ↩
  24. The editors of the Discipline, William Phoebus, Nathan Bangs, and Daniel Hitt, with the Book Agents were instructed to omit this word from the Discipline, substituting for it in every place “church,” “community,” or “itinerancy” as the grammatical construction might require. (Note from the New York Advocate.) ↩
  25. The Thomas L. Douglass note is only on the New York copy. On the original manuscript in Wofford College there are two notes as follows: 1. This document was found with the papers of the late Rev. Daniel Asbury and carefully preserved by his son, the Rev. Henry Asbury. J.B. Anthony 2. This document is now sent to be deposited in the archives of Historical Society of the So. Ca. Conference. Jacob B. Anthony Nov. 20, 1860 ↩

All letters by correspondent